<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serves&#8217;m Right Award: Big Fine for Fake Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timberry.bplans.com/2009/07/servesm-right-award-big-fine-for-fake-reviews.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timberry.bplans.com/2009/07/servesm-right-award-big-fine-for-fake-reviews.html</link>
	<description>Tim Berry on business planning, starting and growing your business, and having a life in the meantime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:26:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Serves’m Right Award: Big Fine for Fake Reviews</title>
		<link>http://timberry.bplans.com/2009/07/servesm-right-award-big-fine-for-fake-reviews.html/comment-page-1#comment-58959</link>
		<dc:creator>Serves’m Right Award: Big Fine for Fake Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timberry.bplans.com/2009/07/servesm-right-award-big-fine-for-fake-reviews.html#comment-58959</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Pantall</title>
		<link>http://timberry.bplans.com/2009/07/servesm-right-award-big-fine-for-fake-reviews.html/comment-page-1#comment-58886</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Pantall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timberry.bplans.com/2009/07/servesm-right-award-big-fine-for-fake-reviews.html#comment-58886</guid>
		<description>I think the New York AG was spot on. Even TV ads have to put &quot;actor portrayal&quot; or something to that effect when the ad features someone acting as a satisfied customer.

New train of thought:  Suppose in some part of the fake reviews there was an &quot;actor portrayal&quot;-type disclaimer. Would they still get fined if the disclaimers were deemed to be not easily found?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the New York AG was spot on. Even TV ads have to put &#8220;actor portrayal&#8221; or something to that effect when the ad features someone acting as a satisfied customer.</p>
<p>New train of thought:  Suppose in some part of the fake reviews there was an &#8220;actor portrayal&#8221;-type disclaimer. Would they still get fined if the disclaimers were deemed to be not easily found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
