<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobody Asked Trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timberry.bplans.com/2007/06/nobody-asked-tr.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timberry.bplans.com/2007/06/nobody-asked-tr.html</link>
	<description>Tim Berry on business planning, starting and growing your business, and having a life in the meantime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:26:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve King</title>
		<link>http://timberry.bplans.com/2007/06/nobody-asked-tr.html/comment-page-1#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 04:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timberry.bplans.com/2007/06/nobody-asked-tr.html#comment-196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that research should be viewed critically, and that biases are often part of the research process.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your post &quot;Mistrust Research&quot; does a nice job of describing these problems, and I&#039;ve posted on it on the Small Biz Labs blog (will be published friday).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I too was surprised by the traditional mail versus email numbers in the ICR survey.  But after thinking about it for a bit, I didn&#039;t find them totally out of line. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to Pew Internet (the most unbiased source I know), about 70% of Americans have Internet access in their homes, and 91% of those with Internet access use email.  Of those using email, 56% use email more or less on a daily basis.  This means only 40% of Americans use email at home on a daily basis, and roughly 36% of all American adults don&#039;t use email at home at all.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Couple these numbers with the impact of spam on regular email users, and it is believable that a substantial majority of adult survey respondents would say they prefer receiving marketing communications via traditional mail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I haven&#039;t seen any other studies on this.  I&#039;ll do a little more digging - email versus traditional mail is an active topic of debate in the direct marketing industry so I would think there would be more research on this topic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that research should be viewed critically, and that biases are often part of the research process.  </p>
<p>Your post &quot;Mistrust Research&quot; does a nice job of describing these problems, and I&#39;ve posted on it on the Small Biz Labs blog (will be published friday).</p>
<p>I too was surprised by the traditional mail versus email numbers in the ICR survey.  But after thinking about it for a bit, I didn&#39;t find them totally out of line. </p>
<p>According to Pew Internet (the most unbiased source I know), about 70% of Americans have Internet access in their homes, and 91% of those with Internet access use email.  Of those using email, 56% use email more or less on a daily basis.  This means only 40% of Americans use email at home on a daily basis, and roughly 36% of all American adults don&#39;t use email at home at all.  </p>
<p>Couple these numbers with the impact of spam on regular email users, and it is believable that a substantial majority of adult survey respondents would say they prefer receiving marketing communications via traditional mail.</p>
<p>I haven&#39;t seen any other studies on this.  I&#39;ll do a little more digging &#8211; email versus traditional mail is an active topic of debate in the direct marketing industry so I would think there would be more research on this topic.</p>
</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Cochrane</title>
		<link>http://timberry.bplans.com/2007/06/nobody-asked-tr.html/comment-page-1#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Cochrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timberry.bplans.com/2007/06/nobody-asked-tr.html#comment-195</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Beyond the conflict of interest here, this is a good example of the ambiguity of many business surveys.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I happen to like trees and try to act in ways that will keep them around. Were I not so inclined, though, I would probably prefer my promotions by mail too, since I experience unsolicited email as a productivity hit but only occasionally get around to even checking my real-world mailbox.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beyond the conflict of interest here, this is a good example of the ambiguity of many business surveys.</p>
<p>I happen to like trees and try to act in ways that will keep them around. Were I not so inclined, though, I would probably prefer my promotions by mail too, since I experience unsolicited email as a productivity hit but only occasionally get around to even checking my real-world mailbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
